People looking for a philosophy online course often want two incompatible things at once: a short, low-commitment survey, and enough argument to feel like they actually did philosophy. The University of Edinburgh’s Introduction to Philosophy on Coursera is built for the first of those jobs. Nine specialists each take one slice of the field, from moral status and testimony to free will and time travel.
The decision is usually not “is philosophy interesting?” It is whether this particular 14-module survey is the right first step, or whether you would be better off with longer case-method lectures or with the same Edinburgh videos off-platform. That is the question this review answers.
Short answer: Worth it as a low-stakes map of contemporary academic philosophy; skip it if you already want depth in one tradition, or if you only need the lectures and not the certificate.
CourseSift is reader-supported. We may earn a commission if you enroll through links on this page, at no extra cost to you.
How We Reviewed This
- Confirmed the instructor team against the official “+8 more” signal: nine named lecturers, not the three cards shown at first glance
- Reconciled duration: the 14 modules add to 18 listed hours, while the page’s suggested pace is 2 weeks at 10 hours a week (20 hours)
- Checked access: the live page shows “Included with Coursera Plus” and “Enroll now,” with no separate full-audit link; the university also publishes the lecture videos free-to-view on its Open Education channel
- Learner comments cluster on two themes: the specialist weeks (especially time travel) land better than the survey weeks, and the quizzes feel easy relative to the questions the lectures raise
Course at a Glance
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Platform | Coursera |
| School / Partner | The University of Edinburgh |
| Course/Program | Introduction to Philosophy |
| Instructor(s) | Dr Dave Ward, Professor Duncan Pritchard, Professor Michela Massimi, Dr Matthew Chrisman, Dr Guy Fletcher, Dr Allan Hazlett, Dr Suilin Lavelle, Dr Elinor Mason, Dr Alasdair Richmond |
| Duration | 14 modules; 18 hours of listed content (official pace: 2 weeks at 10 hours a week) |
| Weekly Time | 10 hours a week (official suggested pace) |
| Level | Not separately labeled on the official page (framed as fundamentals) |
| Mode | Self-paced |
| Certificate | Shareable Coursera certificate; can be added to LinkedIn |
| Price | Included with Coursera Plus; confirm the current rate on the live page |
| Audit Option | No separate “Audit the course” / “Full Course, No Certificate” link shown on the current official page |
| Rating (as of 6 September 2026) | 4.7 course rating (9,724 reviews). Instructor rating: 4.7 from 2,016 ratings |
| Enrolled (as of 6 September 2026) | 742,226 already enrolled |
| Content Last Verified | 6 September 2026 |
| Part of Bundle | No |
Who Should Take This — and Who Should Skip It
Take this if:
- You want a first map of contemporary academic philosophy (epistemology, ethics, mind, science, political obligation, metaphysics) rather than a single historical canon.
- You learn better from short specialist lectures than from one professor talking for 12 weeks.
- You already pay for Coursera Plus, or you specifically want a shareable certificate next to the videos.
- You are fine with English-language analytic classroom style and multiple-choice plus one peer-reviewed write-up.
Skip this if:
- You already read introductory epistemology or ethics and want seminar-level argument, not a tour.
- You want the historical spine from the Presocratics through Plato, or applied political case studies in the style of Harvard’s Justice lectures.
- You only need the lecture videos. The university already posts those free-to-view on its Open Education channel (reuse is not unrestricted; see Alternatives).
- You need a credential employers treat as vocational training. This is an enrichment survey, not a job certificate.
Syllabus
What You’ll Learn
- What distinguishes philosophical questions and methods from neighboring subjects
- Competing accounts of moral judgment: objectivism, relativism, and emotivism
- The classical picture of knowledge, the Gettier problem, and radical scepticism
- Whether there is a duty to obey the law, and what “obeying” even means
- Hume and Reid’s disagreement over testimony
- Leading options in philosophy of mind: behavior, brains, and computer-like programs
- Scientific realism versus antirealism, including the “no miracles” argument
- Determinism, free will, and why the distinction might matter
- Whether time travel is even coherently possible
The official page lists 14 modules totaling 18 hours. That is not the same figure as the suggested schedule of 2 weeks at 10 hours a week (20 hours). Use 18 hours as the content total; plan closer to 20 if you follow the page’s pace and complete the optional readings. Several “Lesson Choices” modules are review/elective slots rather than new core lectures. Module details below use the official descriptions and, where expanded pages showed them, item counts.
Module 1: What is Philosophy? (2 hours)
Dr. Dave Ward opens with what makes philosophy different from other subjects, what its aims and methods are, and why its questions are treated as fundamental. The expanded outline lists 4 videos (about 47 minutes: “What is Philosophy?,” “Philosophy: Difficult, Important and Everywhere,” “Philosophy: How do we do it?,” and “Is There a ‘Right Way’ To Think About Things?”), 3 readings, and 2 assignments.
Why It Matters: This week is the decoder ring for the rest of the course. If you skip it, later modules will feel like disconnected TED-length talks instead of one method applied to different topics.
Module 2: Morality: Objective, Relative or Emotive? (1 hour)
Dr. Matthew Chrisman asks what moral beliefs actually are. Are they reports of objective facts, cultural preferences, or expressions of feeling? The module surveys objectivism, relativism, and emotivism, then the main objections to each. Expanded pages list 4 videos (about 43 minutes), 2 readings, and 1 assignment.
Why It Matters: Most everyday arguments about “that’s just your opinion” stall in this exact fork. Chrisman gives you names for the fork instead of another sermon about being a good person.
Module 3: What is Knowledge? And Do We Have Any? (1 hour)
Professor Duncan Pritchard introduces epistemology: what knowledge is, how we get it, and what radical scepticism does to ordinary claims. Independent listings of the lecture titles include the basic constituents of knowledge, the classical account plus the Gettier problem, and whether we have any knowledge at all.
Why It Matters: If you have ever used the word “certain” in an argument, this week is designed to make that word feel less automatic.
Module 4: Week 2 review: Lesson Choices (1 hour)
A review/elective slot after the morality and knowledge weeks. The official page does not treat this as a new topic lecture.
Module 5: Do We Have an Obligation to Obey the Law? (1 hour)
Dr Guy Fletcher starts from a plain question: the state tells you what you may do, but does that create a duty? The module defines obedience, then walks through three candidate grounds for political obligation and what follows if none of them works.
Why It Matters: This is the most immediately civic week in the course. It is not a civics class; it is a check on the assumption that “it’s the law” ends the argument.
Module 6: Should You Believe What You Hear? (1 hour)
Dr Allan Hazlett stages the Scottish Enlightenment fight between David Hume (1711–1776) and Thomas Reid (1710–1796) over testimony. Hume’s suspicion of second-hand belief sits against Reid’s defence of common sense.
Why It Matters: Almost everything you “know” about science, history, and current events arrives as testimony. The Hume/Reid contrast is a usable filter for that pile.
Module 7: Week 3 review: Lesson Choices (1 hour)
Another review/elective slot after the political-obligation and testimony weeks.
Module 8: Minds, Brains and Computers (2 hours)
Dr Suilin Lavelle asks what it takes to have a mind. The options on the table are dispositions to behave, patterns of neural activation, and programs running on biological hardware, plus the problems each option inherits.
Why It Matters: This is the week that connects the course to conversations people already have about AI and “whether the brain is a computer,” without pretending those slogans settle the issue.
Module 9: Are Scientific Theories True? (1 hour)
Professor Michela Massimi presents scientific realism (including the no-miracles argument) against antirealism, which denies that “truth” is what makes a theory good. The aim is to see both sides’ arguments, not to crown a winner.
Why It Matters: “Trust the science” and “it’s only a model” are usually shouted past each other. Massimi’s framing is the version of that fight actually used in philosophy of science.
Module 10: Week 4 review: Lesson Choices (1 hour)
Review/elective slot after the mind and science weeks.
Module 11: Do We Have Free Will and Does It Matter? (1 hour)
Dr Elinor Mason starts from the familiar feeling that our actions are ours, then asks what follows if those actions sit at the end of a causal chain. Determinism is the organizing concept.
Why It Matters: Free-will talk shows up in blame, praise, and criminal responsibility. Mason keeps the week on the concept rather than on courtroom advice.
Module 12: Time Travel and Philosophy (2 hours)
Dr. Alasdair Richmond uses time travel as a metaphysics case study: is a backwards-travel machine even coherently possible, what would the universe have to be like, and can we know whether ours fits? Learner comments consistently single this week out as the most memorable.
Why It Matters: Time travel is the hook. The real payload is learning how metaphysicians test whether a scenario is intelligible before anyone builds a machine.
Module 13: Week 5 review: Lesson Choices (1 hour)
Final review/elective slot before the writing task.
Module 14: Peer review (2 hours)
The closing module is a peer-reviewed writing task (1 reading and 1 peer review on expanded outlines), not another lecture block. Assessments across the course total 18 assignments, with Coursera flagging AI grading plus the usual disclaimer.
Why It Matters: This is the only point where you have to produce an argument instead of recognizing one. If you skip it, you have watched philosophy, not practiced it.
Prerequisites: None stated on the official page. The course is conceptual rather than formal. You will still meet terms such as scepticism, determinism, and scientific realism; that is the review’s classification, not an official prerequisite.
Who Teaches Introduction to Philosophy
Nine University of Edinburgh philosophers are credited. The official hero line is “Dr Dave Ward +8 more.” The three instructor cards that render first are Ward, Pritchard, and Massimi; the other six teach individual modules and are named in the syllabus text.
Dr Dave Ward is a lecturer in philosophy at Edinburgh working on mind, perception, thought, and agency. He opens the course and is the name Coursera surfaces first. Professor Duncan Pritchard is listed on the course page as University of Edinburgh faculty; he is a specialist in epistemology and takes the knowledge/scepticism module. Professor Michela Massimi takes philosophy of science. The remaining credited lecturers, each tied to a module on the official outline, are Dr Matthew Chrisman (morality), Dr Guy Fletcher (political obligation), Dr. Allan Hazlett (testimony), Dr. Suilin Lavelle (mind), Dr Elinor Mason (free will), and Dr Alasdair Richmond (time travel).
The course rating and the instructor rating happen to share the same 4.7 figure. They are not the same metric: 9,724 course reviews versus 2,016 instructor ratings, as of 6 September 2026. Bios on the official page stay at affiliation and course counts; we are not padding unverified career chronology on top of that.
The development credit on the official description goes to Edinburgh’s Eidyn research centre. An optional companion book, Philosophy for Everyone (Routledge), was written by the same team; it is not required to finish the modules.
Pricing & Financial Aid
Access on the current official page is gated as “Included with Coursera Plus.” The main button reads “Enroll now.” No separate “Audit the course” or “Full Course, No Certificate” link was visible on this page. The University of Edinburgh’s own short-course listing for this title says Coursera lets you preview the first module when you enroll, which is a preview, not a confirmed full free-audit path.
If you already have Coursera Plus: enroll here; the certificate path is already covered by the subscription on this course’s page. If you are paying out of pocket: compare a Plus subscription or the certificate-purchase flow on the live page against simply watching the university’s free-to-view lecture uploads. If you only want the arguments and not a certificate: start with Module 1 on Coursera if the preview is offered in your session, or use the Open Education lecture videos.
Prices and promotions can change. Confirm the current rate on the live course page.
Financial aid: The official Coursera page shows “Financial aid available.” The university’s short-course page for this title also tells learners to apply for aid directly with Coursera.
What You Actually Walk Away With
There is no official salary or hiring-partner claim on this course page, and inventing one would misrepresent the product. This is an enrichment survey: you leave able to name the main contemporary subfields and the standard moves inside them (Gettier cases, no-miracles, Hume vs Reid, compatibilist-style free-will pressure). That is useful if your goal is to read further without getting lost. It is weak if your goal is a professional credential or a single deep tradition.
If you want a first vocabulary for epistemology, ethics, mind, science, and metaphysics, this maps cleanly onto that job. If you already have that vocabulary, the marginal value is mostly the certificate and the peer-review exercise, not Modules 1–3.
Cost per learning hour is not a meaningful number here. Access is subscription-gated on the current page, so there is no honest standalone course price to divide by 18 hours.
How to Enroll
- Open the official Coursera page for Introduction to Philosophy and create or sign in to a Coursera account.
- Use the enroll path shown in your session. On this verification pass the page advertised Coursera Plus inclusion rather than a separate audit link.
- If you need aid, follow the “Financial aid available” link on this course page rather than assuming a general platform policy will apply automatically.
- Expect a first-module preview if your session matches what Edinburgh describes on its short-course listing; full graded access and the shareable certificate follow the paid/Plus path.
- Access is self-paced after enrollment. There is no separate bundle-selection prompt on the current page.
Common Mistakes When Starting Philosophy Online
- Treating “2 weeks at 10 hours a week” as the same fact as “18 hours of modules.” The first is a schedule suggestion; the second is the listed content total. Budget the higher figure if you do the optional reading.
- Paying for a certificate when you only wanted the lectures. The same teaching team already published the lecture videos free-to-view on the university’s Open Education channel (CC-BY-NC; quizzes, peer review, and the Coursera certificate are not part of that upload).
- Stopping at the three instructor cards. Eight additional specialists teach named modules. If you skip the later names, you will miss who is actually arguing the time-travel and testimony weeks.
- Expecting the quizzes to carry the intellectual load. Public comments on this course repeatedly describe the assessments as easy relative to the questions the lectures raise. The peer-review module is the actual writing practice.
- Coming in for Plato-to-Kant history or for Eastern philosophy. The official topics are contemporary subfields in an Edinburgh analytic style. A comment as old as the first run already flagged the missing non-Western names; the current syllabus still does not add them.
How This Philosophy Course Compares
| Introduction to Philosophy | Justice | Ancient Philosophy: Plato & His Predecessors | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform | Coursera | edX (HarvardX) | Coursera |
| Price | Included with Coursera Plus; check live page | Audit path shown on the live edX page; verified certificate priced separately | Included with Coursera Plus; check live page |
| Duration | 18 listed hours (20-hour suggested pace) | Multi-week moral and political lecture series (plan many more hours than 18) | Longer than this survey (official page: about 2 months at 10 hours a week) |
| Certificate | Shareable Coursera certificate | HarvardX verified certificate if paid | Shareable Coursera certificate |
| Mode | Self-paced | Self-paced / session-dated on edX | Self-paced |
| Best Suited For | A short map of several contemporary subfields | Applied moral and political argument with one famous lecturer | Western ancient philosophy, Plato and the Presocratics |
A third path sits outside both tables: the University of Edinburgh’s own lecture uploads on its Open Education YouTube channel. Those are free-to-view copies of this course’s taught videos under a CC-BY-NC license. They are not a full substitute for graded quizzes, peer review, or the Coursera certificate, and reuse is limited by that license.
About Coursera & The University of Edinburgh
About Coursera
Coursera hosts university and industry courses and sells access mainly through Coursera Plus or per-credential checkout. On this page, Introduction to Philosophy is marked as included with Plus, with a shareable certificate if you complete the paid path.
About The University of Edinburgh — Why Learners Search This Course
People search this title because Edinburgh put a recognizable philosophy department on a short, modular MOOC instead of a single celebrity lecture. They search it as a philosophy MOOC that names subfields (epistemology, mind, science, metaphysics) rather than retelling a greatest-hits history. They also search it because the same school keeps producing related public courses, so this one functions as the front door.
The honest limit on the school side is focus. Edinburgh built a contemporary analytic survey. If you arrived hoping for a historical grand tour or a single systematic ethic, the department did not design this course for that job.
Analyst’s Take
Set against Justice, this course is wider and thinner: nine voices, many topics, short weeks. Justice is narrower and heavier: one lecturer, moral and political cases, longer sittings. Set against Ancient Philosophy: Plato & His Predecessors, Edinburgh is modern and topical; Penn is historical and textual. The free Open Education uploads undercut the “I have to pay to hear the arguments” case, which is the real pricing fact most comparison tables skip.
Who should skip this: Anyone who already knows they want either Sandel-style case method or a Plato-first historical sequence. Those are different products, not harder versions of this one.
Practical tip: Watch Ward’s four Module 1 videos and Richmond’s time-travel week before you pay. If those two styles do not click, the remaining specialists will not suddenly turn this into a different course.
After You Enrol
- Do Module 1 before anything optional. Ward’s method lecture is what later weeks assume you already have.
- Treat the “Lesson Choices” modules as optional depth, not as missed core content. The numbered topic weeks are the spine.
- When you hit Pritchard and Massimi, pause and write one objection in your own words before opening the quiz. The assessments will not force that step.
- Use the Hume/Reid week as a reading filter for the rest of your information diet that week, then go back and finish the quiz. The concept sticks better when you apply it once.
- Do not skip the peer-review module if you paid for the credential. It is the only required production of an argument.
- If a week feels thin, read the matching chapter in Philosophy for Everyone rather than hunting a second MOOC immediately. That is the companion the team actually wrote for these modules.
Frequently Asked Questions About Introduction to Philosophy on Coursera
Is Introduction to Philosophy on Coursera worth it?
Yes, if you want an 18-hour, nine-lecturer map of contemporary subfields and you are already in the Coursera Plus ecosystem. No, if you need historical depth or only want the videos; those lectures are already posted free-to-view by the university.
Does Introduction to Philosophy have a free audit?
Not on the current official page we checked. The live listing shows “Enroll now” and “Included with Coursera Plus,” with no separate full-audit link. Edinburgh’s short-course page says the first module can be previewed at enrollment.
Who teaches the University of Edinburgh philosophy MOOC?
Nine credited instructors. Dave Ward, Duncan Pritchard, and Michela Massimi appear on the main cards; Matthew Chrisman, Guy Fletcher, Allan Hazlett, Suilin Lavelle, Elinor Mason, and Alasdair Richmond teach named later modules.
How long does Introduction to Philosophy take?
The modules add to 18 listed hours. The official suggested pace is 2 weeks at 10 hours a week, which is a 20-hour planning figure, not a second content total.
What are the downsides of this course?
The trade-off is breadth over pressure. You meet a lot of subfields in short lectures, and public comments on this course often describe the quizzes as easier than the questions those lectures raise. The peer-review module is the main place the course asks you to argue back.
Are philosophy MOOCs worth it if you are only studying for interest?
They are worth it when the format matches how you actually learn. A short survey like this one is a good interest-first pass because the weeks are modular and the lectures also exist free to view. It is a poor interest-first pass if what you enjoy is slow reading of primary texts; a historical course such as Penn’s Plato sequence fits that habit better.
CourseSift is reader-supported. We may earn a commission if you enroll through links on this page, at no extra cost to you.
📄 Source: Course details sourced from the official Coursera course page for this University of Edinburgh course. See Content Last Verified above.